Diritto Pubblico Comparato ed Europeo

Sommario

1. Posizione del problema: state capture, administrative corruption e influence. – 1.1. Meccanismi di state capture in Serbia. – 2. L’acquisizione del controllo del Parlamento: “dimissioni in bianco”, “commercio” dei mandati, vincolo di mandato imperativo. – 2.1. (Segue): il cumulo degli incarichi e le disfunzioni della legge sul conflitto di interessi. – 3. Corruzione nell’ordinamento giudiziario. – 3.1. Gli organi di autogoverno della magistratura. – 3.2. La Strategia nazionale per la riforma dell’ordinamento giudiziario in Serbia e le proposte de iure condendo.

AbstractThe Author, starting from the concepts of state capture, administrative corruption and influence, analyses the mechanisms through which political elites gain control of public offices, enterprises, utilities and resources through a mingling of state, political party and economic power. Afterwards, dealing with corruption in the Parliament, the essay explains the “blank resignation” technique, the “market of parliamentary mandates” and the “binding of specific instructions” that the deputies must respect. Finally, the Author faces the problem of corruption in the Judiciary, focusing on the crucial topics related to the lack of independence both of the judges and the prosecutors, and also stating the opinions of the Venice Commission on the draft laws set out accordingly to the National Judicial Reform Strategy.