| Una nuova sentenza in materia di insindacabilità parlamentare e diritto di azione in giudizio. Corte europea v. giudice costituzionale: incentivo ad un ripensamento della materia a livello normativo? |
| Fascicolo 2006-2 |
| Scritto da Sciannella Lucia G. |
|
Sommario 1. I termini della questione. – 2. La giurisprudenza della Corte costituzionale nei conflitti di attribuzione in materia di insindacabilità parlamentare. – 3. La posizione della Corte europea tra tutela della funzione parlamentare e diritto di accesso al giudice. – 4. Il dialogo problematico tra le due Corti.
Abstract This paper focuses on the decision (Ielo v. Italy) where the European Court of Human Rights again condemned Italy for having transgressed art. 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, regarding the enforcement of parliamentary immunity. More specifically, the European Court has recognised that the suspension of the trial has deprived Mr Ielo of the opportunity to recover damages. Based on this decision, the European Court has considered valid the lack of a proportionality link between the aim pursued by immunity enforcement and the non-identification of the right of entering the court from an individual considered as an injured party. For the first time the transgression declaration intervenes after the judgement of the Constitutional Court given during a trial for clash of competences (art. 68, c. 1 Const.). It is an innovation compared to the previous judgements. |